Comments on: Kodak Looks to the Future of Photo Sharing https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing Socializing Brands Fri, 06 Jan 2012 08:26:14 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Kent Cartright https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1767 Kent Cartright Mon, 11 Oct 2010 21:46:25 +0000 http://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1767 Un blog interesante, te hace pensar. Agur Un blog interesante, te hace pensar. Agur

]]> By: adjustable dumbells https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1766 adjustable dumbells Sun, 10 Oct 2010 11:17:24 +0000 http://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1766 Hrmm that was weird, my comment got eaten. Anyway I wanted to say that it's nice to know that someone else also mentioned this as I had trouble finding the same info elsewhere. This was the first place that told me the answer. Thanks. Hrmm that was weird, my comment got eaten. Anyway I wanted to say that it’s nice to know that someone else also mentioned this as I had trouble finding the same info elsewhere. This was the first place that told me the answer. Thanks.

]]> By: Milton Kimbrow https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1765 Milton Kimbrow Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:17:34 +0000 http://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1765 I'll gear this review to 2 kinds of community: recent Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and community seeking to choose between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out here, similar the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this can provide you lots info to create an informed conclusion of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as strong.) I’ll gear this review to 2 kinds of community: recent Zune owners who are considering an upgrade, and community seeking to choose between a Zune and an iPod. (There are other players worth considering out here, similar the Sony Walkman X, but I hope this can provide you lots info to create an informed conclusion of the Zune vs players other than the iPod line as strong.)

]]> By: mattress toppers https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1764 mattress toppers Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:27:27 +0000 http://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1764 ccrorrapjyjehmmssgdb, <a href="http://spaceheaterbuy.com" rel="nofollow">space heater</a>, xCvwkPO. ccrorrapjyjehmmssgdb, space heater, xCvwkPO.

]]> By: Jennifer Cisney https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1763 Jennifer Cisney Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:01:35 +0000 http://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1763 You should check out our Digital Picture Frames and Kodak Theatre HD Player - they both work with Flickr! We are pretty active online too, you can check what we are up to here... http://www.kodak.com/go/followus - Jenny (aka Kodak Chief Blogger) You should check out our Digital Picture Frames and Kodak Theatre HD Player – they both work with Flickr!

We are pretty active online too, you can check what we are up to here…

http://www.kodak.com/go/followus

- Jenny (aka Kodak Chief Blogger)

]]> By: Glenn Gutierrez https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1762 Glenn Gutierrez Mon, 16 Feb 2009 17:26:23 +0000 http://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1762 Hmm. Not to knock on Kodak or anything, but they've really been behind on their game. I remember the day when all the film I would buy would be from Kodak. Who buys film nowadays? It's good to see they're doing better but to go out and create something that sounds like another Flickr is silly. They might as well go to Yahoo! and ask to buy Flickr, they'll probably get more bang for their buck. I derno, but I hope they have more to this web thing other than just storing images. Hmm. Not to knock on Kodak or anything, but they’ve really been behind on their game. I remember the day when all the film I would buy would be from Kodak. Who buys film nowadays? It’s good to see they’re doing better but to go out and create something that sounds like another Flickr is silly. They might as well go to Yahoo! and ask to buy Flickr, they’ll probably get more bang for their buck. I derno, but I hope they have more to this web thing other than just storing images.

]]> By: Eran Kampf https://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1761 Eran Kampf Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:48:51 +0000 http://www.blonde20.com/blog/2009/02/16/kodak-looks-to-the-future-of-photo-sharing/#comment-1761 Um.. and I should use their service instead of my Flickr account because... ? I think Jeff Jarvis best described Kodak as a company that defined itself by the atoms it was pushing to consumers (film etc.) rather than realizing its in the business of images and memories. It should have bought Flickr instead of Yahoo to be the brand that you think of when you think of pictures on the web. It missed out on the whole web thing and now by selling these "gifts" online what differentiates it from say, MOO, QOOP (or the rest of the companies at http://www.flickr.com/do/more/) and any other online printing service? Um.. and I should use their service instead of my Flickr account because… ?

I think Jeff Jarvis best described Kodak as a company that defined itself by the atoms it was pushing to consumers (film etc.) rather than realizing its in the business of images and memories.
It should have bought Flickr instead of Yahoo to be the brand that you think of when you think of pictures on the web.

It missed out on the whole web thing and now by selling these “gifts” online what differentiates it from say, MOO, QOOP (or the rest of the companies at http://www.flickr.com/do/more/) and any other online printing service?

]]>